Lesson 2.4 · Reasoning and Proof
Two-column proofs
A proof is a convincing argument that leaves no gaps. In geometry, the most common way to organize one is the two-column proof: a numbered list of statements on the left, each paired with the reason it's true on the right. You've already done this with algebra. Now the statements are about segments and angles.
The parts of a proof
Every proof starts with two things:
- Given: the facts you're allowed to assume. They're usually shown in a diagram too.
- Prove: the statement you need to reach.
Then you build a chain. Each statement must be justified by one of these:
- Given information.
- A definition (midpoint, angle bisector, congruent segments, right angle, and so on).
- A property (of equality or congruence, from the last lesson).
- A postulate: a basic fact accepted without proof.
- A theorem that has already been proven.
The last statement is always the thing you were asked to prove.
Definition
Postulate and theorem
A postulate (or axiom) is a statement accepted as true without proof. A theorem is a statement that has been proven using definitions, postulates and earlier theorems.
Postulates you'll use right away
Two postulates from the foundations unit do a lot of work in proofs.
- Segment Addition Postulate: If is between and , then .
- Angle Addition Postulate: If is in the interior of , then .
And these definitions, which work in both directions:
- Midpoint: is the midpoint of if and only if is on and .
- Angle bisector: bisects if and only if is in the interior of and .
- Congruent segments / angles: if and only if ; if and only if .
How to build a proof
- Write down the Given and the Prove, and mark the diagram.
- Ask: "What would I need to know right before the last step?" Work backward from the Prove.
- Work forward from the Given until the two ends meet.
- Give one reason per statement, and never use a fact before you've stated it.
A first proof
Worked example: Segments with a shared piece
Given: , , , are collinear in that order, and . Prove: .
The idea: is plus , and is plus . Both contain , and the other pieces are equal.
| # | statement | reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Given | |
| 2 | Addition Property of Equality | |
| 3 | Segment Addition Postulate | |
| 4 | Segment Addition Postulate | |
| 5 | Substitution Property of Equality (steps 2, 3, 4) |
Step 5 replaces the left side of step 2 with and the right side (, which is ) with .
Worked example: A midpoint proof
Given: is the midpoint of . Prove: .
| # | statement | reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | is the midpoint of | Given |
| 2 | Definition of midpoint | |
| 3 | Definition of congruent segments | |
| 4 | Segment Addition Postulate | |
| 5 | Substitution Property of Equality (steps 3, 4) | |
| 6 | Simplify (combine like terms) | |
| 7 | Division Property of Equality |
Notice step 3: the definition turns a congruence (figures) into an equation (numbers) so you can do algebra.
Worked example: An angle bisector proof
Given: bisects , and , . Prove: .
| # | statement | reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | bisects | Given |
| 2 | Definition of angle bisector | |
| 3 | Definition of congruent angles | |
| 4 | Substitution Property of Equality | |
| 5 | Subtraction Property of Equality | |
| 6 | Addition Property of Equality | |
| 7 | Division Property of Equality | |
| 8 | Symmetric Property of Equality |
Each angle then measures , so .
Common mistake
Don't skip steps or use the diagram as a reason. Two segments that look equal in a picture aren't a reason. And don't jump from " is the midpoint" straight to "": the definition of midpoint gives the congruence, and the definition of congruent segments turns it into equal lengths. Many teachers accept combining those, but you should know both are happening.
Other proof formats
A paragraph proof says the same thing in sentences: "Since is the midpoint of , . By the Segment Addition Postulate, , so and ." A flow proof uses boxes and arrows. All three formats need the same logic; two-column proofs just make every reason visible.
Tip
Stuck? Look at the reasons you haven't used. If a midpoint or bisector is given, you'll almost certainly need its definition. If points are on a line, the Segment Addition Postulate is probably involved.
Practice
In a two-column proof, what is the reason for the first statement almost always?
Which reason justifies: ", therefore "?
bisects . Which statement follows directly from the definition of angle bisector?
Which reason belongs in step 3?
| # | statement | reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | is between and | Given |
| 2 | , | Given |
| 3 | ? | |
| 4 | Substitution Property of Equality | |
| 5 | Simplify and Symmetric Property |
is the midpoint of , with and . Find .
Enter a number. Fractions like 3/4 and sqrt(2) are OK.
bisects . If and , find in degrees.
Enter a number. Fractions like 3/4 and sqrt(2) are OK.
Given: and . Prove: .
| # | statement | reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Given | |
| 2 | Given | |
| 3 | ? | |
| 4 | Subtraction Property of Equality |
Which reason justifies step 3?
Given: and . Prove: . Which pair of reasons, in order, completes the proof after listing the givens?
| # | statement | reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | , | Given |
| 2 | ? | |
| 3 | ? |